Everything about Jackson Pollock totally explained
Paul Jackson Pollock (
January 28,
1912 –
August 11,
1956) was an influential
American painter and a major force in the
abstract expressionist movement. He was married to noted abstract painter
Lee Krasner.
Early life
Pollock was born in
Cody, Wyoming in 1912, the youngest of five sons. His father was a farmer and later a land surveyor for the government.
The Springs period and the unique technique
In October 1945, Pollock married another important American painter,
Lee Krasner, and in November they moved to what is now known as the
Pollock-Krasner House and Studio in
Springs on
Long Island,
New York.
Peggy Guggenheim loaned them the down payment for the wood-frame house with a nearby barn that Pollock made into a studio. It was there that he perfected the technique of working spontaneously with liquid paint.
Pollock was introduced to the use of liquid paint in 1936, at an experimental workshop operated in
New York City by the Mexican muralist
David Alfaro Siqueiros. He later used paint pouring as one of several techniques in canvases of the early 1940s, such as "Male and Female" and "Composition with Pouring I." After his move to Springs, he began painting with his canvases laid out on the studio floor, and developed what was later called his "drip" technique. The drip technique required paint with a fluid viscosity so Pollock turned to then new synthetic resin-based paints, called "gloss enamel", made for industrial purposes such as spray-painting cars. During WWII, these gloss enamel paints were more available than typical artist’s oil paints, and they were cheaper. Pollock described this use of household and industrial paints, instead of artist’s paints, as "a natural growth out of a need". He used hardened brushes, sticks and even basting syringes as paint applicators. He would poke a hole in the bottom of a tin can of paint to get an extended drip line. Pollock's technique of pouring and dripping paint is thought to be one of the origins of the term
action painting. With this technique, Pollock was able to achieve a more immediate means of creating art, the paint now literally flying from his chosen tool onto the canvas. By defying the conventional way of painting on an upright surface, he added a new dimension, literally, by being able to view and apply paint to his canvases from all directions.
In the process of making paintings in this way he moved away from figurative representation, and challenged the Western tradition of using easel and brush, as well as moving away from use only of the hand and wrist; as he used his whole body to paint. In 1956
Time magazine dubbed Pollock "Jack the Dripper" as a result of his unique painting style.
Pollock observed
Indian sandpainting demonstrations in the 1940s. Other influences on his dripping technique include the Mexican
muralists and also
Surrealist automatism. Pollock denied "the accident"; he usually had an idea of how he wanted a particular piece to appear. It was about the movement of his body, over which he'd control, mixed with the viscous flow of paint, the force of gravity, and the way paint was absorbed into the canvas. The mix of the uncontrollable and the controllable. Flinging, dripping, pouring, spattering, he'd energetically move around the canvas, almost as if in a dance, and wouldn't stop until he saw what he wanted to see. Studies by Taylor, Micolich and Jonas have explored the nature of Pollock's technique and have determined that some of these works display the properties of mathematical
fractals; and that the works become more fractal-like chronologically through Pollock's career. They even go on to speculate that on some level, Pollock may have been aware of the nature of
chaotic motion, and was attempting to form what he perceived as a perfect representation of mathematical chaos - more than ten years before
Chaos Theory itself was discovered.
Even though some experts have pointed to the possibility that he (Pollock) could have simply been imitating popular theories of the time in order to give his paintings a depth not previosly seen.
In 1950
Hans Namuth, a young photographer, wanted to photograph and film Pollock at work. Pollock promised to start a new painting especially for the photographic session, but when Namuth arrived, Pollock apologized and told him the painting was finished. Namuth's comment upon entering the studio:
The 1950s and beyond
Pollock's most famous paintings were during the "drip period" between 1947 and 1950. He rocketed to popular status following an
August 8 1949 four-page spread in
Life Magazine that asked, "Is he the greatest living painter in the United States?" At the peak of his fame, Pollock abruptly abandoned the drip style.
Pollock's work after 1951 was darker in color, including a collection in black on unprimed canvases, followed by a return to color and he reintroduced figurative elements. Good examples of these paintings are "Guardians of the Secret" and "Figure". During this period Pollock had moved to a more commercial gallery and there was great demand from collectors for new paintings. In response to this pressure, along with personal frustration, his
alcoholism deepened.
From naming to numbering
Pollock wanted an end to the viewer's search for representational elements in his paintings, thus he abandoned naming them and started numbering them instead. Of this, Pollock commented: "...look passively and try to receive what the painting has to offer and not bring a subject matter or preconceived idea of what they're to be looking for." Pollock's wife, Lee Krasner, said Pollock "used to give his pictures conventional titles... but now he simply numbers them. Numbers are neutral. They make people look at a picture for what it's - pure painting." It was a centerpiece of the
Museum of Modern Art's 1999 retrospective in New York, the first time the painting had returned to America since its purchase.
In November 2006 Pollock's "
No. 5, 1948" became the world's most expensive painting, when it was auctioned to an undisclosed bidder for the sum of $140,000,000. The previous owner was film and music-producer
David Geffen. It is rumored that the current owner is a German businessman and art collector.
An ongoing debate rages over whether 24 paintings and drawings found in a
Wainscott, New York locker in 2003 are Pollock originals. Physicists have argued over whether
fractals can be used to authenticate the paintings. Analysis of the pigments shows some were not yet patented at the time of Pollock's death, although they may have been available to Pollock through a dealer. The debate is still inconclusive.
In 2006 a documentary,
Who the Fuck Is Jackson Pollock?, was released which featured a truck driver named Teri Horton who bought what may be a Pollock painting worth millions at a thrift store for five dollars.
Relationship to Native American art
Pollock stated:
“I feel nearer, more a part of the painting, since this way I can walk round it, work from the four sides and literally be in the painting. This is akin to the methods of the Indian sand painters of the West.”
Critical debate
Pollock's work has always polarized critics and has been the focus of many important critical debates.
Harold Rosenberg spoke of the way Pollock's work had changed painting, "what was to go on the canvas wasn't a picture but an event. The big moment came when it was decided to paint 'just to paint.' The gesture on the canvas was a gesture of liberation from value — political, aesthetic, moral."
Clement Greenberg supported Pollock's work on formalistic grounds. It fit well with Greenberg's view of art history as being about the progressive purification in form and elimination of historical content. He therefore saw Pollock's work as the best painting of its day and the culmination of the Western tradition going back via
Cubism and
Cézanne to
Monet.
Posthumous exhibitions of Pollock's work had been sponsored by the
Congress for Cultural Freedom, an organization to promote American culture and values backed by the
CIA. Certain left wing scholars, most prominently
Eva Cockcroft, argue that the U.S. government and wealthy elite embraced Pollock and abstract expressionism in order to place the United States firmly in the forefront of global art and devalue
socialist realism. In the words of Cockcroft, Pollock became a 'weapon of the Cold War'.
Painter
Norman Rockwell's work
Connoisseur also appears to make a commentary on the Pollock style. The painting features what seems to be a rather upright man in a suit standing before a Jackson Pollock splatter painting. The contrast between the man and the Pollock painting, along with the construction of the scene, seems to emphasize the disparity between the comparatively unrecognizable Jackson Pollock style and traditional figure and landscape based art styles, as well as the monumental changes in the cultural sense of aesthetics brought on by the modern art movement.
Others such as artist, critic, and satirist
Craig Brown, have been "astonished that decorative 'wallpaper', essentially brainless, could gain such a position in art history alongside
Giotto,
Titian, and
Velázquez."
Reynolds News in a 1959 headline said, "This isn't art — it's a joke in bad taste."
List of major works
- (1942) Male and Female Philadelphia Museum of Art (External Link
)
- (1942) Stenographic Figure Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1943) Mural University of Iowa Museum of Art (External Link
)
- (1943) Moon-Woman Cuts the Circle (External Link
)
- (1943) The She-Wolf Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1943) Blue (Moby Dick) Ohara Museum of Art (External Link
)
- (1945) Troubled Queen Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (External Link
)
- (1946) Eyes in the Heat Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice (External Link
)
- (1946) The Key Art Institute of Chicago (External Link
)
- (1946) The Tea Cup Collection Frieder Burda (External Link
)
- (1946) Shimmering Substance, from The Sounds In The Grass Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1947) Full Fathom Five Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1947) Cathedral (External Link
)
- (1947) Enchanted Forest Peggy Guggenheim Collection (External Link
)
- (1948) Painting (External Link
)
- (1948) Number 5 (4ft x 8ft) Private collection
- (1948) Number 8 (External Link
)
- (1948) Summertime: Number 9A Tate Modern (External Link
)
- (1949) Number 1 Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles
(External Link
)
- (1949) Number 3
- (1949) Number 10 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (External Link
)
- (1950) Number 1, 1950 (Lavender Mist) National Gallery of Art (External Link
)
- (1950) Autumn Rhythm (Number 30), 1950 Metropolitan Museum of Art (External Link
)
- (1950) Number 29, 1950 National Gallery of Canada (External Link
)
- (1950) One: Number 31, 1950 Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1950) No. 32 (External Link
)
- (1951) Number 7 National Gallery of Art (External Link
)
- (1952) Convergence Albright-Knox Art Gallery (External Link
)
- (1952) Blue Poles: No. 11, 1952 National Gallery of Australia(External Link
)
- (1953) Portrait and a Dream (External Link
)
- (1953) Easter and the Totem The Museum of Modern Art (External Link
)
- (1953) Ocean Greyness (External Link
)
- (1953) The Deep
Further Information
Get more info on 'Jackson Pollock'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://jackson_pollock.totallyexplained.com">Jackson Pollock Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |